Get more FiveThirtyEight
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Policy
- Your California Privacy Rights
- Children's Online Privacy Policy
- Interest-Based Ads
© 2018 ABC News Internet Ventures. All rights reserved.
Chance the Democrat wins (23.7%)
Chance the Republican wins (76.3%)
We'll be updating our forecasts every time new data is available, every day through Nov. 6.
The Classic version of our model projects a race’s outcome by taking a weighted average of polls of a district (if available), polls of similar districts (CANTOR) and non-polling factors (fundamentals). It is then reverted toward a mean based on long-term trends in midterms and presidential approval ratings.
R+5.3
Adjusted polls
R+4.4
CANTOR
R+3.7
Fundamentals
R+6.3
Experts
R+5.2
Lite
R+4.6
Classic
R+5.2
Deluxe
<0.1
<0.1
Historical adjustment
Key
More weight
Less
We've collected two polls for the New York 11th. We’re adjusting poll results in three ways: Polls of registered voters or all adults are adjusted to a likely-voter basis; older polls are adjusted based on shifts in the generic congressional ballot since the poll was conducted; and polls are adjusted for house effects (the tendency for a firm’s polls to lean toward Democrats or Republicans). Polls with larger sample sizes and those conducted by higher-quality polling agencies are given more weight, as are more recent polls.
Adjustments | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dates | pollster | sample | weight | Rose | Donovan | margin | likely voter | Time-line | House effects | Adjusted margin | |
Oct. 23-27 10/23-27 | Siena College/New York Times | 495 | LV | 1.55 | 40% | 44% | R+3.3 | — | <0.1 | 0.3 | R+3.6 |
Sep. 4-5 9/4-5 | Public Policy Polling D | 509 | V | 0.37 | 39% | 47% | R+8.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.9 | R+10.1 |
Key
A = adults
RV = Registered voters
V = voters
LV = likely voters
= partisan poll
Our district similarity scores are based on demographic, geographic and political characteristics; if two districts have a score of 100, it means they are perfectly identical. These scores inform a system we use — CANTOR, or Congressional Algorithm using Neighboring Typologies to Optimize Regression — to infer what polling would say in unpolled or lightly polled districts, given what it says in similar districts.
Sim. score | Polling avg. | ||
---|---|---|---|
NY-2 | 69 | — | |
NY-1 | 60 | R+11.7 | |
NY-18 | 58 | — | |
CT-5 | 58 | — | |
CT-3 | 56 | — | |
NJ-3 | 54 | D+0.9 | |
NY-4 | 53 | — | |
NJ-4 | 52 | — | |
NJ-6 | 46 | — | |
IL-3 | 46 | — |
The Classic and Deluxe versions of our model use several non-polling factors to forecast the vote share margin in each district.
Factor | Impact | Explanation |
---|---|---|
Incumbency | 3.1 | Dan Donovan has been elected to 2 terms. Congress has only a 20.1% approval rating, reducing the incumbency advantage. |
District partisanship | 2.6 | NY-11 is 7.5 percentage points more Republican-leaning than the country overall, based on how it has voted in recent presidential and state legislative elections. It voted for Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012. |
Incumbent's margin in last election | 9.7 | Donovan won by 24.8 percentage points in 2016. |
Generic ballot | 6.8 | Democrats lead by an average of 8.6 percentage points in polls of the generic congressional ballot. |
Fundraising | 5.4 | As of Oct. 17, Max Rose had raised $3,410,000 in individual contributions (72% of all such contributions to the major-party candidates); Donovan had raised $1,353,000 (28%). |
Incumbent's voting record in Congress | 0.2 | Donovan has voted with Republicans 78% of the time in roll-call votes in recent sessions of Congress. |
Challenger experience | 0.7 | Rose has never held elected office. |
Scandals | 0.0 | Neither candidate is involved in a scandal. |
Total | R+3.7 |
The Deluxe version of our model calculates an implied margin for each race based on expert race ratings from The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections and Sabato's Crystal Ball; it then adjusts that margin toward its estimate of the national political environment.
Equivalent Margin | |||
---|---|---|---|
Expert | Rating | Raw | Adjusted |
Cook Political Report | R+6.7 | R+6.1 | |
Inside Elections | R+6.7 | R+5.8 | |
Sabato's Crystal Ball | R+6.7 | R+7.1 | |
Average | R+6.7 | R+6.3 |
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2018 midterms forecast. Read more …
Comments