Get more FiveThirtyEight
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Policy
- Your California Privacy Rights
- Children's Online Privacy Policy
- Interest-Based Ads
© 2018 ABC News Internet Ventures. All rights reserved.
Chance a Democrat wins
The Classic version of our model normally projects a race’s outcome by taking a weighted average of polls of the race (if available), polls of similar races (CANTOR) and non-polling factors (fundamentals). Because this race doesn’t include both a Democratic and Republican candidate, CANTOR isn’t used.
Dianne Feinstein
D+12.1
Adjusted polls
Dianne Feinstein
—
CANTOR
Dianne Feinstein
D+41.4
Fundamentals
Dianne Feinstein
—
Experts
D+12.1
Lite
D+15.2
Classic
D+15.2
Deluxe
—
—
Historical adjustment
Key
More weight
Less
We've collected 19 polls for the California Senate election. We’re adjusting poll results in three ways: Polls of registered voters or all adults are adjusted to a likely-voter basis; older polls are adjusted based on shifts in the generic congressional ballot since the poll was conducted; and polls are adjusted for house effects (the tendency for a firm’s polls to lean toward Democrats or Republicans). Polls with larger sample sizes and those conducted by higher-quality polling agencies are given more weight, as are more recent polls.
Adjustments | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dates | pollster | sample | weight | Feinstein | de Leon | margin | likely voter | Time-line | House effects | Adjusted margin | |
Nov 2-4 11/2-4 | Change Research | 1,108 | LV | 2.02 | 42% | 32% | +10 | — | — | — | +10 |
Nov 1-3 11/1-3 | Research Co. | 450 | RV | 1.03 | 47% | 28% | +19 | — | — | — | +19 |
Nov 1-2 11/1-2 | SurveyUSA | 806 | LV | 2.59 | 50% | 36% | +14 | — | — | — | +14 |
Oct 25-30 10/25-30 | Probolsky Research | 900 | LV | 1.46 | 41% | 35% | +6 | — | — | — | +6 |
Oct 19-25 10/19-25 | UC Berkeley | 1,339 | LV | 1.03 | 45% | 36% | +9 | — | — | — | +9 |
Oct 10-24 10/10-24 | YouGov | 2,178 | RV | 1.21 | 36% | 29% | +7 | — | — | — | +7 |
Oct 12-21 10/12-21 | Public Policy Institute of California | 989 | LV | 1.14 | 43% | 27% | +16 | — | — | — | +16 |
Oct 17-19 10/17-19 | Emerson College | 671 | LV | 0.80 | 41% | 23% | +18 | — | — | — | +18 |
Oct 12-14 10/12-14 | SurveyUSA | 762 | LV | 0.29 | 40% | 26% | +14 | — | — | — | +14 |
Sep 17-Oct 14 9/17-10/14 | USC Dornsife/LA Times | 794 | LV | 0.24 | 44% | 31% | +13 | — | — | — | +13 |
Oct 5-6 10/5-6 | 1st Tuesday Campaigns | 1,038 | LV | 0.37 | 43% | 30% | +13 | — | — | — | +13 |
Sep 16-18 9/16-18 | Vox Populi Polling | 500 | LV | 0.09 | 55% | 45% | +10 | — | — | — | +10 |
Sep 9-18 9/9-18 | Public Policy Institute of California | 964 | LV | 0.04 | 40% | 29% | +11 | — | — | — | +11 |
Sep 5-14 9/5-14 | Ipsos | 1,021 | LV | 0.13 | 44% | 24% | +20 | — | — | — | +20 |
Aug 29-Sep 2 8/29-9/2 | Probolsky Research | 900 | LV | 0.00 | 37% | 29% | +8 | — | — | — | +8 |
Jul 8-17 7/8-17 | Public Policy Institute of California | 1,020 | LV | 0.00 | 46% | 24% | +22 | — | — | — | +22 |
Jun 26-27 6/26-27 | SurveyUSA | 559 | LV | 0.00 | 46% | 24% | +22 | — | — | — | +22 |
Jun 6-17 6/6-17 | USC Dornsife/LA Times | 767 | RV | 0.00 | 32% | 16% | +16 | — | — | — | +16 |
Apr 16-18 4/16-18 | Probolsky Research | 900 | RV | 0.00 | 38% | 27% | +11 | — | — | — | +11 |
Key
A = adults
RV = Registered voters
V = voters
LV = likely voters
= partisan poll
Our state similarity scores are based on demographic, geographic and political characteristics; if two states have a score of 100, it means they are perfectly identical. These scores inform a system we use — CANTOR, or Congressional Algorithm using Neighboring Typologies to Optimize Regression — to infer what polling would say in unpolled or lightly polled states, given what it says in similar states.
Sim. score | Polling avg. | ||
---|---|---|---|
New Mexico | 46 | D+17.0 | |
Nevada | 45 | D+1.0 | |
Washington | 44 | D+15.6 | |
Arizona | 43 | D+1.8 | |
Illinois | 41 | — | |
Colorado | 39 | — | |
New York | 38 | D+24.7 | |
Hawaii | 35 | — | |
Oregon | 33 | — | |
New Jersey | 28 | D+10.1 |
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2018 midterm forecasts. Read more …
Comments