>99 in 100

Chance the Democrat wins (99.7%)

<1 in 100

Chance the Republican wins (0.3%)

us_map2See the national overview
Forecasted turnout
Partisan lean

# What goes into the
icon_classic_2
classic forecast in Connecticut

The Classic version of our model projects a race’s outcome by taking a weighted average of polls of the race (if available), polls of similar races (CANTOR) and non-polling factors (fundamentals). It is then reverted toward a mean based on long-term trends in midterms and presidential approval ratings.

  • D+18.8

    Adjusted polls

  • D+17.5

    CANTOR

  • D+33.1

    Fundamentals

  • D+23.7

    Experts

  • D+18.8

    icon_lite_2

    Lite

  • D+21.3

    icon_classic_2

    Classic

  • D+22.1

    icon_deluxe_2

    Deluxe

  • <0.1

  • <0.1

Historical adjustment

Key

More weight

Less

#Latest polls

We've collected six polls for the Connecticut Senate election. We’re adjusting poll results in three ways: Polls of registered voters or all adults are adjusted to a likely-voter basis; older polls are adjusted based on shifts in the generic congressional ballot since the poll was conducted; and polls are adjusted for house effects (the tendency for a firm’s polls to lean toward Democrats or Republicans). Polls with larger sample sizes and those conducted by higher-quality polling agencies are given more weight, as are more recent polls.

Adjustments
datespollstersampleweight
Murphy
Corey
marginlikely voterTime-lineHouse effects Adjusted margin
Oct 30-Nov 1
10/30-11/1
Gravis Marketing681LV
1.51
58%35%D+23.0 <0.1 1.4 D+24.4
Oct 27-29
10/27-29
Emerson College780LV
1.93
55%35%D+20.0 <0.1 0.6 D+20.6
Oct 22-28
10/22-28
Quinnipiac University1,201LV
2.08
56%41%D+15.0 <0.1 1.0 D+14.1
Oct 3-8
10/3-8
Quinnipiac University767LV
0.21
57%42%D+15.0 <0.1 1.0 D+14.0
Aug 24-27
8/24-27
Gravis Marketing606LV
0.00
54%37%D+17.0 0.1 1.4 D+18.5
Aug 16-21
8/16-21
Quinnipiac University1,029RV
0.00
59%31%D+28.0 0.2 0.3 1.0 D+27.1
Weighted averageD+18.8

Our latest coverage

#Similar states and CANTOR

Our state similarity scores are based on demographic, geographic and political characteristics; if two states have a score of 100, it means they are perfectly identical. These scores inform a system we use — CANTOR, or Congressional Algorithm using Neighboring Typologies to Optimize Regression — to infer what polling would say in unpolled or lightly polled states, given what it says in similar states.

Sim. scorePolling avg.
New Jersey79D+10.1
Massachusetts70D+23.2
New York67D+24.7
Rhode Island62D+22.2
Illinois60
Maryland55D+33.6
Delaware53D+20.8
Pennsylvania51D+11.7
New Hampshire49
Virginia44D+14.1

#Expert ratings

The Deluxe version of our model calculates an implied margin for each race based on expert race ratings from The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections and Sabato's Crystal Ball; it then adjusts that margin toward its estimate of the national political environment.

Equivalent Margin
Expertrating RatingRaw Adjusted
Cook Political Report
Solid D
D+23.3D+23.9
Inside Elections
Solid D
D+23.3D+24.2
Sabato's Crystal Ball
Safe D
D+23.3D+22.9
AverageD+23.3D+23.7

How this forecast works

Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2018 midterm forecasts. Read more …

Comments