Get more FiveThirtyEight
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Policy
- Your California Privacy Rights
- Children's Online Privacy Policy
- Interest-Based Ads
© 2018 ABC News Internet Ventures. All rights reserved.
Chance the Democrat wins (21.2%)
Chance the Republican wins (78.8%)
The Classic version of our model projects a race’s outcome by taking a weighted average of polls of the race (if available), polls of similar races (CANTOR) and non-polling factors (fundamentals). It is then reverted toward a mean based on long-term trends in midterms and presidential approval ratings.
R+5.3
Adjusted polls
R+11.2
CANTOR
D+0.4
Fundamentals
R+5.9
Experts
R+5.3
Lite
R+4.9
Classic
R+5.2
Deluxe
<0.1
<0.1
Historical adjustment
Key
More weight
Less
We've collected 40 polls for the Texas Senate election. We’re adjusting poll results in three ways: Polls of registered voters or all adults are adjusted to a likely-voter basis; older polls are adjusted based on shifts in the generic congressional ballot since the poll was conducted; and polls are adjusted for house effects (the tendency for a firm’s polls to lean toward Democrats or Republicans). Polls with larger sample sizes and those conducted by higher-quality polling agencies are given more weight, as are more recent polls.
Adjustments | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dates | pollster | sample | weight | O'Rourke | Cruz | margin | likely voter | Time-line | House effects | Adjusted margin | |
Nov 3-5 11/3-5 | Trafalgar Group | 2,135 | LV | 2.46 | 43% | 52% | R+8.9 | — | <0.1 | 1.4 | R+7.5 |
Nov 1-2 11/1-2 | Change Research D | 1,211 | LV | 1.30 | 49% | 49% | EVEN | — | <0.1 | 1.5 | R+1.5 |
Oct 28-30 10/28-30 | Emerson College | 781 | LV | 1.55 | 47% | 50% | R+3.1 | — | <0.1 | 0.6 | R+2.5 |
Oct 22-28 10/22-28 | Quinnipiac University | 1,078 | LV | 1.50 | 46% | 51% | R+5.0 | — | <0.1 | 1.0 | R+5.9 |
Oct 15-28 10/15-28 | University of Texas - Tyler | 905 | LV | 0.83 | 43% | 47% | R+3.6 | — | <0.1 | 0.3 | R+3.9 |
Oct 25-26 10/25-26 | Dixie Strategies | 588 | LV | 0.88 | 42% | 52% | R+10.0 | — | <0.1 | 1.1 | R+8.9 |
Oct 18-21 10/18-21 | GBA Strategies D | 1,000 | LV | 0.72 | 46% | 50% | R+4.0 | — | <0.1 | 2.1 | R+6.1 |
Oct 15-21 10/15-21 | YouGov | 927 | LV | 0.71 | 45% | 51% | R+6.0 | — | <0.1 | 2.3 | R+3.7 |
Oct 12-18 10/12-18 | Ipsos | 1,298 | LV | 0.87 | 44% | 49% | R+4.5 | — | <0.1 | 0.6 | R+3.9 |
Oct 10-14 10/10-14 | Tulchin Research D | 600 | LV | 0.34 | 45% | 49% | R+4.0 | — | <0.1 | 5.3 | R+9.3 |
Oct 9-13 10/9-13 | CNN/SSRS | 716 | LV | 0.55 | 45% | 52% | R+7.0 | — | <0.1 | 0.8 | R+7.8 |
Oct 8-13 10/8-13 | WPA Intelligence R | 801 | LV | 0.37 | 43% | 52% | R+9.0 | — | <0.1 | 6.5 | R+2.5 |
Oct 8-11 10/8-11 | Siena College/New York Times | 800 | LV | 0.64 | 43% | 51% | R+8.1 | — | <0.1 | 0.3 | R+8.4 |
Oct 3-9 10/3-9 | Quinnipiac University | 730 | LV | 0.14 | 45% | 54% | R+9.0 | — | <0.1 | 1.0 | R+10.0 |
Oct 2-5 10/2-5 | YouGov | 881 | LV | 0.16 | 44% | 50% | R+6.0 | — | <0.1 | 2.3 | R+3.7 |
Oct 1-5 10/1-5 | Emerson College | 500 | LV | 0.07 | 42% | 47% | R+4.6 | — | <0.1 | 0.6 | R+4.0 |
Sep 19-20 9/19-20 | Public Policy Polling D | 613 | V | 0.07 | 45% | 48% | R+3.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.9 | R+5.1 |
Sep 19-20 9/19-20 | Public Policy Polling D | 603 | V | 0.07 | 46% | 49% | R+3.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.9 | R+5.1 |
Sep 16-18 9/16-18 | Vox Populi Polling | 508 | LV | 0.09 | 50% | 50% | EVEN | — | 0.1 | 0.7 | D+0.6 |
Sep 11-17 9/11-17 | Quinnipiac University | 807 | LV | 0.02 | 45% | 54% | R+9.0 | — | 0.1 | 1.0 | R+10.1 |
Sep 6-14 9/6-14 | Ipsos | 992 | LV | 0.02 | 47% | 45% | D+2.0 | — | 0.1 | 0.6 | D+2.5 |
Sep 11-12 9/11-12 | Reform Austin D | 1,161 | LV | 0.07 | 45% | 49% | R+4.0 | — | 0.1 | 2.5 | R+6.6 |
Sep 6-9 9/6-9 | Rasmussen Reports/Pulse Opinion Research | 800 | LV | 0.07 | 44% | 47% | R+3.0 | — | 0.1 | 1.8 | R+1.3 |
Sep 6-7 9/6-7 | Dixie Strategies | 519 | LV | 0.01 | 42% | 46% | R+4.1 | — | 0.1 | 1.1 | R+3.2 |
Aug 22-25 8/22-25 | Emerson College | 550 | RV | 0.00 | 37% | 38% | R+0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.6 | R+0.0 |
Aug 12-16 8/12-16 | Marist College | 759 | RV | 0.03 | 45% | 49% | R+4.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | R+4.3 |
Aug 1-2 8/1-2 | Public Policy Polling D | 797 | V | 0.00 | 42% | 46% | R+4.0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.9 | R+5.4 |
Jul 26-31 7/26-31 | Quinnipiac University | 1,118 | RV | 0.00 | 43% | 49% | R+6.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.0 | R+6.5 |
Jul 9-25 7/9-25 | Texas Lyceum | 441 | LV | 0.00 | 39% | 41% | R+2.0 | — | 0.6 | 1.0 | R+2.3 |
Jul 3-7 7/3-7 | Gravis Marketing | 602 | LV | 0.00 | 42% | 51% | R+9.0 | — | 0.7 | 1.4 | R+6.9 |
Jun 19-22 6/19-22 | YouGov | 821 | LV | 0.00 | 40% | 50% | R+10.0 | — | 0.8 | 2.3 | R+6.9 |
Jun 8-17 6/8-17 | YouGov | 1,200 | RV | 0.00 | 36% | 41% | R+5.0 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 2.3 | R+2.0 |
May 29-Jun 5 5/29-6/5 | Greenberg Quinlan Rosner D | 1,000 | LV | 0.00 | 43% | 49% | R+6.0 | — | 0.9 | 1.7 | R+6.8 |
May 23-29 5/23-29 | Quinnipiac University | 961 | RV | 0.00 | 39% | 50% | R+11.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | R+11.2 |
May 21-28 5/21-28 | Baselice & Associates Inc. R | 601 | LV | 0.00 | 36% | 48% | R+12.0 | — | 1.0 | 4.9 | R+6.1 |
May 21-22 5/21-22 | Public Policy Polling D | 861 | V | 0.00 | 42% | 48% | R+6.0 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.9 | R+7.0 |
May 19-21 5/19-21 | JMC Enterprises R | 575 | LV | 0.00 | 40% | 47% | R+7.0 | — | 1.0 | 3.1 | R+2.8 |
Apr 12-17 4/12-17 | Quinnipiac University | 1,029 | RV | 0.00 | 44% | 47% | R+3.0 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 1.0 | R+3.1 |
Jan 17-18 1/17-18 | Public Policy Polling D | 757 | V | 0.00 | 37% | 45% | R+8.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.9 | R+9.9 |
Dec 12-14 12/12-14 | WPA Intelligence R | 600 | LV | 0.00 | 34% | 52% | R+18.0 | — | 0.4 | 6.5 | R+11.9 |
Key
A = adults
RV = Registered voters
V = voters
LV = likely voters
= partisan poll
Our state similarity scores are based on demographic, geographic and political characteristics; if two states have a score of 100, it means they are perfectly identical. These scores inform a system we use — CANTOR, or Congressional Algorithm using Neighboring Typologies to Optimize Regression — to infer what polling would say in unpolled or lightly polled states, given what it says in similar states.
Sim. score | Polling avg. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Georgia | 57 | — | |
Florida | 56 | D+3.0 | |
Arizona | 54 | D+1.8 | |
Louisiana | 51 | No race | |
Missouri | 48 | D+0.5 | |
Kansas | 46 | — | |
South Carolina | 46 | — | |
Oklahoma | 44 | — | |
North Carolina | 43 | No race | |
Indiana | 40 | D+3.0 |
The Deluxe version of our model calculates an implied margin for each race based on expert race ratings from The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections and Sabato's Crystal Ball; it then adjusts that margin toward its estimate of the national political environment.
Equivalent Margin | |||
---|---|---|---|
Expert | rating Rating | Raw | Adjusted |
Cook Political Report | EVEN | D+0.6 | |
Inside Elections | R+12.1 | R+11.2 | |
Sabato's Crystal Ball | R+6.7 | R+7.1 | |
Average | R+6.3 | R+5.9 |
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2018 midterm forecasts. Read more …
Comments