Mick Mulvaney

R
Republican representative for South Carolina’s 5th District
Trump score
How often Mulvaney votes in line with Trump's position
Trump margin
Trump's share of the vote in the 2016 election in South Carolina’s 5th District minus Clinton's
Predicted score
How often Mulvaney is expected to support Trump based on Trump's 2016 margin
Trump plus-minus
Difference between Mulvaney’s actual and predicted Trump-support scores
0.0%
+18.5 
0.0%
0.0 
Trump score
How often Mulvaney votes in line with Trump's position
0.0%
Trump margin
Trump's share of the vote in the 2016 election in South Carolina’s 5th District minus Clinton's
+18.5 
Predicted score
How often Mulvaney is expected to support Trump based on Trump's 2016 margin
0.0%
Trump plus-minus
Difference between Mulvaney’s actual and predicted Trump-support scores
0.0 
DateMeasureTrump PositionMulvaney VoteAgree with Trump?Likelihood of agreementPlus-minus
Feb. 15 Repeal of a Department of Labor rule on drug testing of applicants for unemployment compensation (236-189)
Trump Position
support
Mulvaney Vote
Not voting
Agree with Trump?
——
Likelihood of agreement
99.1%
Plus-minus
——
Feb. 15 Repeal of a rule that allowed a new type of state-based retirement plan (231-193)
Trump Position
support
Mulvaney Vote
Not voting
Agree with Trump?
——
Likelihood of agreement
97.2%
Plus-minus
——
Feb. 15 Repeal of a rule that allowed a new type of retirement plan established by local governments (234-191)
Trump Position
support
Mulvaney Vote
Not voting
Agree with Trump?
——
Likelihood of agreement
98.1%
Plus-minus
——
Feb. 7 Repeal of a Department of Education rule on teacher preparation programs (240-181)
Trump Position
support
Mulvaney Vote
Not voting
Agree with Trump?
——
Likelihood of agreement
98.2%
Plus-minus
——
Feb. 7 Repeal of a Department of Education rule on school accountability (234-190)
Trump Position
support
Mulvaney Vote
Not voting
Agree with Trump?
——
Likelihood of agreement
98.1%
Plus-minus
——
Feb. 7 Repeal of changes to Bureau of Land Management planning rules (234-186)
Trump Position
support
Mulvaney Vote
Not voting
Agree with Trump?
——
Likelihood of agreement
98.2%
Plus-minus
——
Feb. 3 Repeal of a rule requiring energy companies to reduce waste and emissions (221-191)
Trump Position
support
Mulvaney Vote
Not voting
Agree with Trump?
——
Likelihood of agreement
97.3%
Plus-minus
——
Feb. 2 Repeal of a rule requiring the Social Security Administration to submit information to the national background-check system (235-180)
Trump Position
support
Mulvaney Vote
Not voting
Agree with Trump?
——
Likelihood of agreement
99.0%
Plus-minus
——
Feb. 2 Repeal of a rule requiring some federal contractors to report labor violations (236-187)
Trump Position
support
Mulvaney Vote
Not voting
Agree with Trump?
——
Likelihood of agreement
98.3%
Plus-minus
——
Feb. 1 Repeal of the stream protection rule (228-194)
Trump Position
support
Mulvaney Vote
Not voting
Agree with Trump?
——
Likelihood of agreement
97.3%
Plus-minus
——
Feb. 1 Repeal of a rule requiring energy companies to disclose payments to foreign governments (235-187)
Trump Position
support
Mulvaney Vote
Not voting
Agree with Trump?
——
Likelihood of agreement
96.8%
Plus-minus
——
Jan. 24 Permanent ban on the use of federal funds for abortion or health coverage that includes abortions (238-183)
Trump Position
support
Mulvaney Vote
Not voting
Agree with Trump?
——
Likelihood of agreement
98.9%
Plus-minus
——
Jan. 13 Waiver allowing James Mattis to become secretary of defense (268-151)
Trump Position
support
Mulvaney Vote
Not voting
Agree with Trump?
——
Likelihood of agreement
96.5%
Plus-minus
——
Jan. 13 Budget resolution to repeal the Affordable Care Act (227-198)
Trump Position
support
Mulvaney Vote
Not voting
Agree with Trump?
——
Likelihood of agreement
92.9%
Plus-minus
——
Jan. 5 Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2017 (237-187)
Trump Position
support
Mulvaney Vote
Not voting
Agree with Trump?
——
Likelihood of agreement
99.0%
Plus-minus
——
Average
0.0%
0.0%
0.0

Members’ “likelihood of agreement” scores on each vote are calculated using a regression for which the input is Trump's 2016 vote margin in every member's state or district and the output is the probability that a member will vote for the bill. The plus-minus on each vote is the difference between the member's vote (100 percent for a “yes,” 0 percent for a “no”) and the likelihood of agreement. Averages do not include missed votes. How this works »

CommentsAdd Comment