UPDATED May 8, 2020, at 12:24 AM

Where The Latest COVID-19 Models Think We're Headed — And Why They Disagree

Models predicting the potential spread of the COVID-19 pandemic have become a fixture of American life. Yet each model tells a different story about the devastation to come, making it hard to know which one is “right.” But COVID-19 models aren’t made to be unquestioned oracles. They’re not trying to tell us one precise future, but rather the range of possibilities given the facts on the ground.

One of their more sober tasks is predicting the number of Americans who will die due to COVID-19. FiveThirtyEight — with the help of the Reich Lab at the University of Massachusetts Amherst — has assembled six models published by infectious disease researchers to illustrate possible trajectories of the pandemic’s death toll. In doing so, we hope to make them more accessible, as well as highlight how the assumptions underlying the models can lead to vastly different estimates. Here are the models’ U.S. fatality projections for the coming weeks.

See forecasts from 

Forecasts like these are useful because they help us understand the most likely outcomes as well as best- and worst-case possibilities — and they can help policymakers make decisions that can lead us closer to those best-case outcomes.

And looking at multiple models is better than looking at just one because it's difficult to know which model will match reality the closest. Even when models disagree, understanding why they are different can give us valuable insight.

Coronavirus is hard to understand. FiveThirtyEight can help.

How do the models differ?

Each model makes different assumptions about properties of the novel coronavirus, such as how infectious it is and the rate at which people die once infected. They also use different types of math behind the scenes to make their projections. And perhaps most importantly, they make different assumptions about the amount of contact we should expect between people in the near future.

Understanding the underlying assumptions that each model is currently using can help us understand why some forecasts are more optimistic or pessimistic than others.

    State-by-state breakdown

    Below are individual forecasts for all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

    Alabama

    369 deaths as of May 7

    Alaska

    10 deaths

    Arizona

    450 deaths

    Arkansas

    87 deaths

    California

    2,535 deaths

    Colorado

    944 deaths

    Connecticut

    2,797 deaths

    Delaware

    202 deaths

    District of Columbia

    285 deaths

    Florida

    1,600 deaths

    Georgia

    1,355 deaths

    Hawaii

    17 deaths

    Idaho

    67 deaths

    Illinois

    3,111 deaths

    Indiana

    1,414 deaths

    Iowa

    231 deaths

    Kansas

    165 deaths

    Kentucky

    294 deaths

    Louisiana

    2,208 deaths

    Maine

    62 deaths

    Maryland

    1,503 deaths

    Massachusetts

    4,552 deaths

    Michigan

    4,345 deaths

    Minnesota

    508 deaths

    Mississippi

    396 deaths

    Missouri

    449 deaths

    Montana

    16 deaths

    Nebraska

    91 deaths

    Nevada

    297 deaths

    New Hampshire

    114 deaths

    New Jersey

    8,807 deaths

    New Mexico

    172 deaths

    New York

    26,144 deaths

    North Carolina

    513 deaths

    North Dakota

    31 deaths

    Ohio

    1,271 deaths

    Oklahoma

    260 deaths

    Oregon

    121 deaths

    Pennsylvania

    3,589 deaths

    Rhode Island

    388 deaths

    South Carolina

    316 deaths

    South Dakota

    31 deaths

    Tennessee

    238 deaths

    Texas

    985 deaths

    Utah

    61 deaths

    Vermont

    53 deaths

    Virginia

    769 deaths

    Washington

    891 deaths

    West Virginia

    51 deaths

    Wisconsin

    374 deaths

    Wyoming

    7 deaths

    Comments