METHODOLOGY
Get more FiveThirtyEight
There’s a lot of complaining about gerrymandering, but what should districts look like? We went back to the drawing board and drew a set of alternative congressional maps for the entire country. Each map has a different goal: One is designed to encourage competitive elections, for example, and another to maximize the number of majority-minority districts. See how changes to district boundaries could radically alter the partisan and racial makeup of the U.S. House — without a single voter moving or switching parties. How we did this »
Show current district boundaries
Gerrymander districts to favor Republicans
Gerrymander districts to favor Democrats
Match partisan breakdown of seats to electorate
Promote highly competitive elections
Maximize number of majority-minority districts
Make district shapes compact (using an algorithm)
Make districts compact while following county borders
← National map
Chance of being represented by either party
Usually Democratic districts | Highly competitive districts | Usually Republican districts | |
---|---|---|---|
Current |
Usually Democratic districts | Highly competitive districts | Usually Republican districts | |
---|---|---|---|
Current |
Party probabilities
Every district by the chance it will be represented by either party
Democratic gerrymander | ||
Compact (algorithmic) | ||
Compact (borders) | ||
Proportionally partisan | ||
Current | ||
Majority minority | ||
Highly competitive | ||
Republican gerrymander |
How the maps compare on district competitiveness, minority makeup, respect for local borders, compactness and the efficiency gap, an attempt to gauge how politically gerrymandered a set of districts is
Current | 0% |
Compact (borders) | 0% |
Proportional | 0% |
Competitive | D+2% |
Dem. gerrymander | D+3% |
Majority minority | R+4% |
Compact (algorithmic) | D+6% |
GOP gerrymander | R+20% |
Competitive | 17 |
Compact (algorithmic) | 12 |
Current | 9 |
Proportional | 8 |
Compact (borders) | 8 |
Majority minority | 7 |
Dem. gerrymander | 3 |
GOP gerrymander | 2 |
Majority minority | 10 |
Compact (borders) | 10 |
Current | 9 |
GOP gerrymander | 9 |
Dem. gerrymander | 9 |
Compact (algorithmic) | 8 |
Proportional | 8 |
Competitive | 8 |
Compact (borders) | 26 |
Proportional | 27 |
Competitive | 33 |
Current | 36 |
Majority minority | 40 |
Dem. gerrymander | 44 |
GOP gerrymander | 61 |
Compact (algorithmic) | 79 |
Compact (borders) | 1 |
Proportional | 2 |
Compact (algorithmic) | 3 |
Current | 4 |
Competitive | 5 |
Majority minority | 6 |
Dem. gerrymander | 7 |
GOP gerrymander | 8 |
The racial or ethnic makeup of each district and each district’s likelihood of being represented by a member of a racial or ethnic minority, based on election results since 2006
Share of population by race | Chance of being represented by a ... | Chance of being represented by a ... | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | District | Majority Race | 0% 50% 100% | Minority member | Democrat | Republican | ||||
1st | White | 2% | 20% | 80% | ||||||
2nd | White | 5% | 30% | 70% | ||||||
3rd | White | 3% | 55% | 45% | ||||||
4th | White | 7% | 78% | 22% | ||||||
5th | Minority coalition | 94% | >99% | <1% | ||||||
6th | Minority coalition | 26% | >99% | <1% | ||||||
7th | Minority coalition | 69% | >99% | <1% | ||||||
8th | African-American | 95% | >99% | <1% | ||||||
9th | African-American | 93% | >99% | <1% | ||||||
10th | White | 10% | >99% | <1% | ||||||
11th | White | 3% | 29% | 71% | ||||||
12th | White | 10% | >99% | <1% | ||||||
13th | Hispanic/ Latino | 94% | >99% | <1% | ||||||
14th | Minority coalition | 69% | >99% | <1% | ||||||
15th | Hispanic/ Latino | 98% | >99% | <1% | ||||||
16th | Minority coalition | 51% | >99% | <1% | ||||||
17th | White | 8% | 91% | 9% | ||||||
18th | White | 4% | 43% | 57% | ||||||
19th | White | 1% | 37% | 63% | ||||||
20th | White | 3% | 90% | 10% | ||||||
21st | White | 1% | 25% | 75% | ||||||
22nd | White | 1% | 15% | 85% | ||||||
23rd | White | <1% | 15% | 85% | ||||||
24th | White | 2% | 74% | 26% | ||||||
25th | White | 5% | 91% | 9% | ||||||
26th | White | 8% | 97% | 3% | ||||||
27th | White | <1% | 3% | 97% |
Comments