Get more FiveThirtyEight
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Policy
- Your California Privacy Rights
- Children's Online Privacy Policy
- Interest-Based Ads
© 2018 ABC News Internet Ventures. All rights reserved.
Chance the Democrat wins (47.6%)
Chance the Republican wins (52.4%)
We'll be updating our forecasts every time new data is available, every day through Nov. 6.
The Classic version of our model projects a race’s outcome by taking a weighted average of polls of a district (if available), polls of similar districts (CANTOR) and non-polling factors (fundamentals). It is then reverted toward a mean based on long-term trends in midterms and presidential approval ratings.
R+0.3
Adjusted polls
R+1.6
CANTOR
R+0.2
Fundamentals
D+2.6
Experts
R+0.3
Lite
R+0.4
Classic
D+0.6
Deluxe
<0.1
<0.1
Historical adjustment
Key
More weight
Less
We've collected five polls for the North Carolina 9th. We’re adjusting poll results in three ways: Polls of registered voters or all adults are adjusted to a likely-voter basis; older polls are adjusted based on shifts in the generic congressional ballot since the poll was conducted; and polls are adjusted for house effects (the tendency for a firm’s polls to lean toward Democrats or Republicans). Polls with larger sample sizes and those conducted by higher-quality polling agencies are given more weight, as are more recent polls.
Adjustments | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dates | pollster | sample | weight | McCready | Harris | margin | likely voter | Time-line | House effects | Adjusted margin | |
Oct. 26-30 10/26-30 | Siena College/New York Times | 505 | LV | 1.65 | 44% | 45% | R+1.2 | — | <0.1 | 0.3 | R+1.5 |
Oct. 1-5 10/1-5 | Siena College/New York Times | 502 | LV | 0.14 | 42% | 47% | R+4.5 | — | <0.1 | 0.3 | R+4.8 |
Oct. 2-4 10/2-4 | SurveyUSA | 556 | LV | 0.48 | 45% | 41% | D+4.0 | — | <0.1 | 0.1 | D+3.9 |
Jul. 5-8 7/5-8 | SurveyUSA | 543 | LV | 0.00 | 43% | 36% | D+7.0 | — | 0.6 | 0.1 | D+7.5 |
Mar. 8-13 3/8-13 | Anzalone Liszt Grove Research D | 500 | LV | 0.00 | 44% | 43% | D+1.0 | — | 0.6 | 4.0 | R+2.4 |
Key
A = adults
RV = Registered voters
V = voters
LV = likely voters
= partisan poll
Our district similarity scores are based on demographic, geographic and political characteristics; if two districts have a score of 100, it means they are perfectly identical. These scores inform a system we use — CANTOR, or Congressional Algorithm using Neighboring Typologies to Optimize Regression — to infer what polling would say in unpolled or lightly polled districts, given what it says in similar districts.
Sim. score | Polling avg. | ||
---|---|---|---|
NC-2 | 77 | R+8.6 | |
NC-8 | 76 | — | |
SC-2 | 76 | — | |
NC-13 | 75 | R+2.9 | |
NC-7 | 69 | D+0.5 | |
AR-2 | 69 | R+9.8 | |
SC-5 | 68 | — | |
NC-5 | 68 | — | |
NC-6 | 68 | — | |
VA-7 | 66 | R+0.9 |
The Classic and Deluxe versions of our model use several non-polling factors to forecast the vote share margin in each district.
Factor | Impact | Explanation |
---|---|---|
District partisanship | 10.9 | NC-9 is 13.6 percentage points more Republican-leaning than the country overall, based on how it has voted in recent presidential and state legislative elections. It voted for Trump in 2016 and Romney in 2012. |
Previous incumbent's margin in last election | 0.9 | A Republican won by 16.4 percentage points in this district in 2016. Previous district results are not strongly predictive in races without incumbents. |
Generic ballot | 8.4 | Democrats lead by an average of 8.6 percentage points in polls of the generic congressional ballot. |
Fundraising | 3.3 | As of Oct. 17, Daniel Kent McCready had raised $3,833,000 in individual contributions (72% of all such contributions to the major-party candidates); Mark Harris had raised $1,496,000 (28%). |
Candidate experience | 0.0 | Neither McCready nor Harris has held elected office before. |
Scandals | 0.0 | Neither candidate is involved in a scandal. |
Total | R+0.2 |
The Deluxe version of our model calculates an implied margin for each race based on expert race ratings from The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections and Sabato's Crystal Ball; it then adjusts that margin toward its estimate of the national political environment.
Equivalent Margin | |||
---|---|---|---|
Expert | Rating | Raw | Adjusted |
Cook Political Report | EVEN | D+0.6 | |
Inside Elections | EVEN | D+0.9 | |
Sabato's Crystal Ball | D+6.7 | D+6.3 | |
Average | D+2.2 | D+2.6 |
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2018 midterms forecast. Read more …
Comments