Get more FiveThirtyEight
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Policy
- Your California Privacy Rights
- Children's Online Privacy Policy
- Interest-Based Ads
© 2018 ABC News Internet Ventures. All rights reserved.
Chance the Democrat wins (89.2%)
Chance the Republican wins (10.8%)
We'll be updating our forecasts every time new data is available, every day through Nov. 6.
The Classic version of our model projects a race’s outcome by taking a weighted average of polls of a district (if available), polls of similar districts (CANTOR) and non-polling factors (fundamentals). It is then reverted toward a mean based on long-term trends in midterms and presidential approval ratings.
D+4.2
Adjusted polls
D+10.5
CANTOR
D+14.9
Fundamentals
D+8.9
Experts
D+4.2
Lite
D+8.4
Classic
D+8.5
Deluxe
<0.1
<0.1
Historical adjustment
Key
More weight
Less
We've collected four polls for the Arizona 1st. We’re adjusting poll results in three ways: Polls of registered voters or all adults are adjusted to a likely-voter basis; older polls are adjusted based on shifts in the generic congressional ballot since the poll was conducted; and polls are adjusted for house effects (the tendency for a firm’s polls to lean toward Democrats or Republicans). Polls with larger sample sizes and those conducted by higher-quality polling agencies are given more weight, as are more recent polls.
Adjustments | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dates | pollster | sample | weight | O'Halleran | Rogers | margin | likely voter | Time-line | House effects | Adjusted margin | |
Oct. 31-Nov. 1 10/31-11/1 | Optimus | 756 | LV | 1.34 | 48% | 45% | D+2.4 | — | <0.1 | 2.6 | D+5.0 |
Oct. 16-18 10/16-18 | American Viewpoint R | 400 | LV | 0.44 | 46% | 46% | EVEN | — | <0.1 | 5.3 | D+5.3 |
Oct. 9-10 10/9-10 | Go Right Strategies R | 943 | LV | 0.27 | 38% | 44% | R+6.9 | — | <0.1 | 7.0 | D+0.1 |
Sep. 27-28 9/27-28 | Go Right Strategies R | 738 | LV | 0.06 | 36% | 39% | R+3.2 | — | <0.1 | 7.0 | D+3.8 |
Key
A = adults
RV = Registered voters
V = voters
LV = likely voters
= partisan poll
Our district similarity scores are based on demographic, geographic and political characteristics; if two districts have a score of 100, it means they are perfectly identical. These scores inform a system we use — CANTOR, or Congressional Algorithm using Neighboring Typologies to Optimize Regression — to infer what polling would say in unpolled or lightly polled districts, given what it says in similar districts.
Sim. score | Polling avg. | ||
---|---|---|---|
CO-3 | 63 | R+9.0 | |
NM-2 | 62 | R+0.9 | |
NV-4 | 58 | D+3.6 | |
NM-3 | 56 | D+22.1 | |
NV-2 | 51 | R+19.3 | |
OR-2 | 51 | R+12.7 | |
WA-3 | 51 | R+4.9 | |
AZ-2 | 51 | D+10.6 | |
CA-1 | 50 | — | |
CA-8 | 47 | — |
The Classic and Deluxe versions of our model use several non-polling factors to forecast the vote share margin in each district.
Factor | Impact | Explanation |
---|---|---|
Incumbency | 3.2 | Tom O'Halleran has been elected to 1 term. Congress has only a 20.1% approval rating, reducing the incumbency advantage. |
District partisanship | 2.0 | AZ-1 is 5.5 percentage points more Republican-leaning than the country overall, based on how it has voted in recent presidential and state legislative elections. It voted for Trump in 2016 and Romney in 2012. |
Incumbent's margin in last election | 5.4 | O'Halleran won by 7.3 percentage points in 2016 in an open-seat race. |
Generic ballot | 7.0 | Democrats lead by an average of 8.6 percentage points in polls of the generic congressional ballot. |
Fundraising | 1.7 | As of Oct. 17, O'Halleran had raised $1,389,000 in individual contributions (57% of all such contributions to the major-party candidates); Wendy Rogers had raised $1,064,000 (43%). |
Incumbent's voting record in Congress | 1.0 | O'Halleran has voted with Democrats 82% of the time in roll-call votes in recent sessions of Congress. |
Challenger experience | 0.7 | Rogers has never held elected office. |
Scandals | 0.0 | Neither candidate is involved in a scandal. |
Total | D+14.9 |
The Deluxe version of our model calculates an implied margin for each race based on expert race ratings from The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections and Sabato's Crystal Ball; it then adjusts that margin toward its estimate of the national political environment.
Equivalent Margin | |||
---|---|---|---|
Expert | Rating | Raw | Adjusted |
Cook Political Report | D+6.7 | D+7.4 | |
Inside Elections | D+6.7 | D+7.6 | |
Sabato's Crystal Ball | D+12.1 | D+11.7 | |
Average | D+8.5 | D+8.9 |
Nate Silver explains the methodology behind our 2018 midterms forecast. Read more …
Comments