What Redistricting Looks Like In Every State
An updating tracker of proposed congressional maps — and whether they might benefit Democrats or Republicans in the 2022 midterms and beyond. How this works »
Governor's proposal | D+2.7 |
State House Democratic proposal | D+2.3 |
State Senate Democratic proposal 2 | D+2.3 |
Philip T. Gressman et al. proposal | R+1.3 |
Draw the Lines PA proposal | R+1.3 |
Concerned Citizens for Democracy proposal | R+1.3 |
New map | R+1.3 |
Khalif Ali et al. proposal | R+1.4 |
State Senate Democratic proposal 1 | R+2.2 |
Old map | R+2.3 |
Guy Reschenthaler et al. proposal 1 | R+4.0 |
Guy Reschenthaler et al. proposal 2 | R+4.0 |
Citizen-Voters proposal | R+5.2 |
Updated preliminary plan | R+6.6 |
Voters of the Commonwealth proposal | R+7.0 |
Preliminary plan | R+7.3 |
State House Democratic proposal | D+8.7 |
Concerned Citizens for Democracy proposal | D+3.1 |
New map | D+3.0 |
Draw the Lines PA proposal | D+3.0 |
State Senate Democratic proposal 1 | D+3.0 |
Philip T. Gressman et al. proposal | D+3.0 |
Governor's proposal | D+2.9 |
State Senate Democratic proposal 2 | D+2.9 |
Khalif Ali et al. proposal | D+2.9 |
Old map | D+1.0 |
Updated preliminary plan | R+3.5 |
Preliminary plan | R+3.5 |
Citizen-Voters proposal | R+3.5 |
Guy Reschenthaler et al. proposal 2 | R+3.6 |
Guy Reschenthaler et al. proposal 1 | R+3.6 |
Voters of the Commonwealth proposal | R+3.6 |
Concerned Citizens for Democracy proposal | 4/17 |
Draw the Lines PA proposal | 4/17 |
State Senate Democratic proposal 2 | 4/17 |
Old map | 3/18 |
Khalif Ali et al. proposal | 3/17 |
New map | 3/17 |
Governor's proposal | 3/17 |
Preliminary plan | 3/17 |
Guy Reschenthaler et al. proposal 1 | 3/17 |
Guy Reschenthaler et al. proposal 2 | 3/17 |
Updated preliminary plan | 3/17 |
Voters of the Commonwealth proposal | 3/17 |
Citizen-Voters proposal | 2/17 |
Philip T. Gressman et al. proposal | 2/17 |
State House Democratic proposal | 2/17 |
State Senate Democratic proposal 1 | 2/17 |
District | Partisan lean | Racial makeup |
---|---|---|
1st | R+25 | |
2nd | R+7 | |
3rd | D+24 | |
4th | R+36 | |
5th | R+39 | |
6th | R+39 | |
7th | R+31 | |
8th | R+18 | |
9th | R+24 | |
10th | R+26 | |
11th | EVEN | |
12th | EVEN | |
13th | D+21 | |
14th | D+30 | |
15th | R+2 | |
16th | D+77 | |
17th | D+41 |
The racial makeup of each district is of the voting-age population.
The latest in Pennsylvania
The U.S. Supreme Court has denied an injunction as requested by Pennsylvania Republicans who filed a lawsuit challenging the new map for the commonwealth’s congressional districts. The plaintiffs disputed the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s right to set the districts, calling it “unconstitutional.” However, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the case; instead it will be sent to a federal three-judge panel. However, this is unlikely to happen before the 2022 elections, meaning the new maps will likely remain in place for the midterms.
Pennsylvania’s Democratic-majority Supreme Court stepped in to finalize the maps after Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf vetoed the map chosen by the Republican-controlled state legislature, causing a stalemate. The court selected a final map that was submitted by a group of citizens who wanted to hew as closely as possible to the status quo while redrawing the district lines from 18 districts down to 17 as a result of the census. Their map was drawn by Jonathan Rodden, a political science professor at Stanford University and director of the university's Spatial Social Science Lab. The new map drops one Republican-leaning seat to leave eight Republican-leaning seats, six Democratic-leaning seats and three highly competitive seats. It has a median seat bias of R+1.3 but an efficiency gap of D+3.0, indicating a relatively fair map.
Latest changes 🤖
Feb. 23, 2022
Jan. 24, 2022
Jan. 24, 2022
Jan. 24, 2022
Comments